Menteia · Menteia Hedge · October 2026 · Confidential
# 24-month roadmap **Menteia Hedge** — AI investment committee: 12 analysts (quantitative and style-based) and a deterministic risk officer that recommend with evidence and explain every decision.
## Next 8 weeks (before asking for money) What YC recommends doing first: talk to users, charge early and get 10 customers who actually use the product. - Interview 10 advisors registered with the CNBV. - Charge 1 of them, even a small amount. - If nobody pays, shelve it. Milestones tied to the use of funds. Each quarter has a deliverable the investor can verify. ## Months 1–6: Validate and register - Own repository and differentiation from upstream - CNBV adviser registration - Market interviews ## Months 7–12: Commercial launch - Pro subscription - First 3 white-label advisers - 200 subscribers ## Months 13–18: Mexican equities - BMV/BIVA coverage - Brokerage partnership - 450 subscribers ## Months 19–24: Scale - ~700 subscribers - 15 advisers - Decide on Series A or integration with Doble D ## Features that answer competitors' customer complaints Taken from 09_Competencia_y_Quejas: what customers complain about with competitors that we do not fully cover yet. ### Months 1–6 - **Public live track record with metrics (hit rate, vs S&P, drawdown)** (partial, high): A hash-chained paper portfolio log exists, but no public metrics page with re-verified results. - **CNBV investment adviser registration** (missing, high): Required before charging for recommendations; already on the months 1–6 roadmap. - **Documented human oversight (adviser reviews before publishing)** (partial, high): Risk is deterministic, but there's no human review workflow; the CNBV expects one and it fits the white-label model. - **Spanish interface and explanations** (partial, medium): The value proposition cites English-only tools as a pain, but full Spanish coverage is not documented. ### Months 7–12 - **One-click cancel, pre-renewal notice and prorated refund** (missing, high): No billing yet; designing it this way at commercial launch turns the sector's top complaint into a differentiator. - **White label for independent advisers** (partial, high): Pricing defined (US$300/mo) but no clients or multi-client dashboard yet; first 3 advisers in months 7–12. - **Low monthly price and MXN option** (partial, medium): Free demo and Pro at US$15/mo (cheaper than Danelfin or Seeking Alpha), but no MXN pricing or local payment method. - **Analysis of the user's own portfolio (import holdings)** (missing, medium): Today it analyzes tickers and paper portfolios; missing risk and recommendations on what the user already holds. - **Human support with response-time commitment** (missing, medium): Not planned; robo-advisors lose reputation over unhelpful support. ### Months 13–18 - **BMV/BIVA equities coverage** (missing, medium): US market only; on the months 13–18 roadmap. - **Connection to brokers usable from Mexico (GBM, IBKR)** (missing, medium): Paper-only execution via Alpaca; the few-brokers complaint applies here too. - **Mobile app with alerts** (partial, low): Signals via Telegram and webhook; no own app. ## Metrics we will report every quarter - Subscribers and demo → Pro conversion - White-label advisers - Audited signal performance - Monthly churn - MRR